In the worst-case scenario a salmon farmed on the Chilean coast could be sent by container ship to Dalian, China, to be filleted, then shipped back across the Pacific to Vancouver. From there it would cross Canada by truck, be processed and packaged in Lunenberg, (Nova Scotia) and go right back out the door. If it ended up in a supermarket in, say, San Diego, that salmon would have traveled 22,300 miles, a distance close to the circumference of the earth.
Bottomfeeder, 2008
Taras Grescoe
Long before I read Taras Grescoe’s enlightening book, I was well aware of the fact that many fish took to traveling internationally even more widely after they were caught and frozen. This, of course, is one of the challenges of doing a taste test of any type of tinned fish, or frozen for that matter. The others are the processed fish labeling laws for countries around the world, and the ever increasing ‘counterfeit’ labeling. In researching tinned ‘sardines’ on the Internet, I found the results of a few comparative tastings that seemed to take the labels on the cans as a fixed point of reference with little regard to the point of origin of the fish, which in turn does have an affect on the manner in which they are processed and the final taste and texture. So, aside from inaccurate claims made by the companies that market the sardines I chose to sample, I believe that I have taken these other factors into account. I’ll address my ‘inaccurate claims’ part in a bit, but first some background information.